Invest with Values

The Investor's Gateway to Positive Change

The Investor's Gateway to Positive Change

  • RESOURCE DIRECTORY
    • GETTING STARTED
    • FULL DIRECTORY
    • Top Resources
    • Share a Resource
  • NEWS CENTER
    • NEWS CENTER
    • By Category
      • Local Banking
      • Community Investing
      • Impact Investing
      • Sustainable-Responsible Investing
      • Featured Articles
      • Beyond Investing
      • IWV news
      • Top Resources
    • News Partners
      • 3BLmedia
      • AllianceMagazine
      • CorporateKnights
      • GreenMoney
      • Locavesting
      • MaxImpact
      • InvestWithValues Sponsors
      • InvestWithValues Partners
    • Newsletter Sign-up
    • Newsletter Archive
  • About
    • About Us
    • Brian Kaminer
    • Learn More
    • Testimonials
    • Investments Talk! Video
    • Launch Press Release
    • News Center Press Release
  • Sponsors & Partners
    • Sponsors
    • Partners
  • Connect
    • Contact Us
    • Survey
    • IWV News
    • Share a Resource
  • Spoiler title
    Free GuideSubscribeClose
    Get a free 30 minute personalized guide to
    Invest With Values, after subscribing.
    * = required field

As shareholders get active on climate, the SEC lets companies duck votes

March 28, 2018 By ImpactAlpha

EOG Resources rejection of resolution from Trillium suggests limits of shareholder engagement

Many impact investors posit that holding positions in public companies leads to positive impact because of the ability to pressure management through shareholder proposals.

Champions of this approach point to recent examples like the ExxonMobil shareholder proposal that shareholders approved last May requesting that the oil giant consider enhanced reporting on climate change risks. (See, for example, “With new pledge, another foundation moves to align endowment with mission.”)

A recent SEC action highlights, however, the limitations of shareholder activism under federal and state law. Trillium Asset Management recently demanded that EOG Resources, an oil and gas company, submit for a shareholder vote a proposal to consider targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Exxon shareholders are voting today on the Paris agreement

In response, EOG Resources argued that it was not required to submit the proposal for a vote because of an SEC rule that allows companies to refuse proposals that related to “ordinary business operations.” EOG also sought confirmation from the SEC that it could legally refuse the proposal.

In a published “no-action letter,” the SEC agreed with EOG, stating that the proposal sought to “micromanage the Company by probing too deeply into matters of a complex nature upon which shareholders, as a group, would not be in a position to make an informed judgment.”

One could argue that this is simply another example of the Trump administration showing its dislike of climate-related regulation and activism. But this SEC action exposes real legal limitations on the ability of shareholders to influence corporate behavior. Both federal and state laws prohibit shareholder actions that seek to dictate corporate management decisions.

The ExxonMobil vote was heralded as a victory for activism. But the ExxonMobil board was not legally required to implement the climate-related proposal approved by shareholders. The proposal was completely non-binding from a legal perspective. ExxonMobil could likely have rejected from consideration a binding proposal because it would have impinged on the board’s exclusive authority to manage the company.

It took seven months after shareholders voted to approve the proposal for the ExxonMobil board to announce it had dropped its opposition and would implement the recommendations related to enhanced reporting.

Originally published at bluedotlaw.com on March 22, 2018.


As shareholders get active on climate, the SEC lets companies duck votes was originally published in ImpactAlpha on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Share This:

This post was originally published on ImpactAlpha.com


home-compass-croppedVisit the Invest With Values - Resource Directory to access leading investor information, opportunities, organizations, events, groups and tools.

Filed Under: -Impact Investing, -Sustainable-Responsible Investing

About ImpactAlpha

Led by David Bank, formerly of The Wall Street Journal, ImpactAlpha is establishing a major new media brand for the growing number of people who believe our most pressing social and environmental challenges represent the biggest business opportunities of the 21st century. ImpactSpace is the world’s largest open impact database of ventures, funds, deals, people and organizations.
Learn more about ImpactAlpha and their articles.

News Search

Sponsors

Talgra RSF RSF Social Finance logo Trillium MicroVest MicroVest LOCUS LOCUS Impact Investing CFC capital for change

Events

All News by Category

Take the Survey

Why do you care about money and investing?
  • Home
  • Directory
  • News Center
  • Sponsors & Partners
  • About
  • Connect
  • Google Plus
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Copyright © 2021 • Invest with Values • All Rights Reserved • 914-230-0741 · info(at)talgra.com
Created and Managed by Brian Kaminer of Talgra LLC

Disclaimer: The information shared through investwithvalues.com has been provided by Talgra, LLC (“Talgra”). No representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by Talgra, the sponsors, partners or contributors as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. The website is for educational and informational purposes only and is subject to change. This does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to purchase or sell any security, and nothing herein should be construed as such. The opinions represented in this directory are those of Talgra and should be considered in conjunction with advice from a professional advisor in the context of your particular investment situation. The specific investments included in this website are examples of investments that can be made in each of the different investment categories and are not recommendations to purchase any individual security or investment vehicle.